Author: Lynn Green

  • Climate Change – What’s Going On?

    Climate Change – What’s Going On?

     

    **This is a personal website and reflects my thoughts and convictions. It does not represent any official position held by Youth With A Mission.**

    I leave from Malaysia later today and SO look forward getting back home to England–even more so because we are having a really warm and sunny Easter long weekend. The Eco Warriors are out on the streets and some are hoping to block Heathrow airport. I hope they don’t succeed with that objective because I want my plane to land there!

    We are told that this will be the hottest Easter since 1949 when it was 29C. So when did climate change start? The 1930s were the hottest decade in the 20th century. So when did climate change start? Professor William Happer of Princeton points out that in the history of this planet, CO2 levels have been up to 10 times more than they are today. But there were no CO2 emissions from the activities of people then. He actually claims that, in comparison to other eras on earth we are in a CO2 drought and the world would be a more habitable place with more CO2.  Hmmm! There must be more to this than meets the eye!  You can hear some of his thoughts at:

    In many cases, the media have drawn our attention to the children who want action to save the world they will inherit. But who is telling them what and why are children being used as the voice on this issue? Climate change is about science, so why has this subject been dominated by emotions and shouting and anger–to the extent that we can no longer discuss and debate the scientific evidence?

    I don’t claim to understand it all because the subject seems almost infinitely complex. But I want to find out more without being labelled a “denier” and shouted at.

    What’s going on?

    So Prof Happer thinks we are in a CO2 drought, but Bjorn Blomberg thinks it is a problem that must be addressed.  He had enough  influence to assemble a team of economists and scientists, including two Nobel Laureates, to examine the ten biggest issues facing humanity. The team then ranked them in a very reasonable order:  They examined what we could spend money on now with view to making the biggest difference to the future world.  Their finding are really eye-opening.  Take 15 minutes to watch his Ted Talk.  If that intrigues you, you will easily find more recent updates from him.

    We know that this is a very important issue, if for no other reason than the fact that young people are being told things that make them very fearful and anxious.  We can be easily intimidated by the complexity of the science and end up simply believing those who are shouting the loudest and getting the most media attention.  But whenever vast amounts of money and power are involved, we have to be very sceptical about the loudest voices and then pursue more information.  It’s not hard to find scores of eminent scientist who have dissenting opinions about both causes and solutions–and they are worth listening to.

    So what’s going on?   Think about that.

    Lynn Green.

  • The Deep State and Brexit

    The Deep State and Brexit

     

    **This is a personal website and reflects my thoughts and convictions. It does not represent any official position held by Youth With A Mission.**

    After countless articles charting the erratic course of Brexit, and the comments of scores of columnists, I read something earlier this week that shed new light on the subject—at least for me.  The title of the article was “The Deep State Would Never Have Allowed a No-Deal Brexit”.  That term, Deep State, came into common usage in the 1990s and refers to the power structures beneath the visible and accountable government.

    I recommend that everyone should set aside an hour or two at their earliest convenience to do some research on the Deep State. I can guarantee deep insights and lots of laughs from some of most clever comedy writing and acting ever!  Watch “Yes Minister”; the first episode can be found at

    Since it came out nearly 40 years ago, it has often been referred to as more of a documentary than comedy.

    That headline got me thinking about the likes of Sir Humphry and Sir Arnold.  They are the senior civil servants who provide continuity while governments and ministers come and go.  They are drawn from the educated elite and naturally think of themselves as most qualified to shape policy and to apply governmental power.

    Senior civil servants are drawn from the best universities where they have usually distinguished themselves with first-class degrees.   Most of them would have always known they are the cream of the crop, attending the best schools and on to Oxford or Cambridge.  However, when it comes to temperament, the civil service does not attract risk-takers.  They are equipped and chosen to provide stability and predictable order.  Creative, entrepreneurial types do not apply for the civil service.

    This arrangement works well, if slowly and with red tape, under normal circumstances.  The voters demand change, MPs attempt to implement change and the civil servants act in a slow and orderly way—usually doing what the government has decided.

    The vote to leave Europe was a terrible blow for the civil service because it created a massive additional work load and guaranteed a measure of chaos for some years and that’s anathema to Sir Humphrey and Sir Arnold.  However, if the Government and Parliament were working well, they could have required the Deep State to cooperate and implement the referendum result.  But Parliament, and the Government, have been divided, to a degree that is without precedent in modern times.  In fact the majority of both the Government and Parliament voted to remain in the EU and yet they were supposed to implement a massive change that they did not want.

    Without clear direction from the elected representatives, the unelected Deep State opposed change.  But, that is their job—at least to some extent.  I don’t blame the civil servants for acting according to their temperament.  I also remember that many, probably most, of them have been told all their lives that they know best and are certainly better placed than ordinary voters to know what is good for the nation.

    But that is not how democracy works, although sadly, that’s how it has worked this time.

    On the bright side, though, I still have confidence that we will disengage in great measure from the European Super-State.  When the messy process is over, we will look back on it and judge that it was worth all the hassle to regain a measure of national sovereignty and greater freedom to fulfil our national calling in the global community.  When the dust has settled, we will be able to work out warm relationships with the other European nations and, I believe, put new life into the Commonwealth.

    It is also likely that Brexit will embolden other European nations to put a brake on the relentless process of centralizing more and more power into the EU machinery.  A German leader wrote to me earlier this week, “We are proud of you Britain, since you dare to challenge the European structure.”

    Above all this, “The King’s heart is like a stream of water in the hand of the Lord; He guides it where ever He pleases.”  We are not anxious!

    Lynn Green.

  • The Dream

    The Dream

    http://traffic.libsyn.com/lynngreen/The_Dream.mp3

     

    **This is a personal website and reflects my thoughts and convictions. It does not represent any official position held by Youth With A Mission.**

  • The Dream

    The Dream

     

    **This is a personal website and reflects my thoughts and convictions. It does not represent any official position held by Youth With A Mission.**