Category: Current Events

  • The Deep State and Brexit

    The Deep State and Brexit

     

    **This is a personal website and reflects my thoughts and convictions. It does not represent any official position held by Youth With A Mission.**

    After countless articles charting the erratic course of Brexit, and the comments of scores of columnists, I read something earlier this week that shed new light on the subject—at least for me.  The title of the article was “The Deep State Would Never Have Allowed a No-Deal Brexit”.  That term, Deep State, came into common usage in the 1990s and refers to the power structures beneath the visible and accountable government.

    I recommend that everyone should set aside an hour or two at their earliest convenience to do some research on the Deep State. I can guarantee deep insights and lots of laughs from some of most clever comedy writing and acting ever!  Watch “Yes Minister”; the first episode can be found at

    Since it came out nearly 40 years ago, it has often been referred to as more of a documentary than comedy.

    That headline got me thinking about the likes of Sir Humphry and Sir Arnold.  They are the senior civil servants who provide continuity while governments and ministers come and go.  They are drawn from the educated elite and naturally think of themselves as most qualified to shape policy and to apply governmental power.

    Senior civil servants are drawn from the best universities where they have usually distinguished themselves with first-class degrees.   Most of them would have always known they are the cream of the crop, attending the best schools and on to Oxford or Cambridge.  However, when it comes to temperament, the civil service does not attract risk-takers.  They are equipped and chosen to provide stability and predictable order.  Creative, entrepreneurial types do not apply for the civil service.

    This arrangement works well, if slowly and with red tape, under normal circumstances.  The voters demand change, MPs attempt to implement change and the civil servants act in a slow and orderly way—usually doing what the government has decided.

    The vote to leave Europe was a terrible blow for the civil service because it created a massive additional work load and guaranteed a measure of chaos for some years and that’s anathema to Sir Humphrey and Sir Arnold.  However, if the Government and Parliament were working well, they could have required the Deep State to cooperate and implement the referendum result.  But Parliament, and the Government, have been divided, to a degree that is without precedent in modern times.  In fact the majority of both the Government and Parliament voted to remain in the EU and yet they were supposed to implement a massive change that they did not want.

    Without clear direction from the elected representatives, the unelected Deep State opposed change.  But, that is their job—at least to some extent.  I don’t blame the civil servants for acting according to their temperament.  I also remember that many, probably most, of them have been told all their lives that they know best and are certainly better placed than ordinary voters to know what is good for the nation.

    But that is not how democracy works, although sadly, that’s how it has worked this time.

    On the bright side, though, I still have confidence that we will disengage in great measure from the European Super-State.  When the messy process is over, we will look back on it and judge that it was worth all the hassle to regain a measure of national sovereignty and greater freedom to fulfil our national calling in the global community.  When the dust has settled, we will be able to work out warm relationships with the other European nations and, I believe, put new life into the Commonwealth.

    It is also likely that Brexit will embolden other European nations to put a brake on the relentless process of centralizing more and more power into the EU machinery.  A German leader wrote to me earlier this week, “We are proud of you Britain, since you dare to challenge the European structure.”

    Above all this, “The King’s heart is like a stream of water in the hand of the Lord; He guides it where ever He pleases.”  We are not anxious!

    Lynn Green.

  • The Dangers of Overstating the Case

    The Dangers of Overstating the Case

    Photo by ©Alena Koval from Pexels.

     

    **This is a personal website and reflects my thoughts and convictions. It does not represent any official position held by Youth With A Mission.**

     

    I bought a T Shirt because I thought the slogan was very funny:

    “Exaggerators Anonymous – a trillion-strong and growing!”

    Have you ever been in an argument where you overstated your case?  An old friend of mine used to refer to that sort of conversation in his marriage as “the always and never conversations”.  Such as, “You NEVER think of how I feel!”  Or “You ALWAYS have to be right, don’t you!?”

    When any case is overstated, we tend to dismiss it, or at least take it less seriously.

    There is no question that we have a number of environmental problems—endangered animals, insects and plants, plastics in the oceans and landfills, climate change, air pollution, scarcity of fresh water etc. The crisis message is coming through loud and clear.

    The extent and the urgency of these problems are very hard to state clearly because they are often nearly impossible to measure and causes are hard to pin down with certainty.  If we read beyond the headlines and opening paragraphs, we are confronted by their complexity.  In their attempts to simplify, journalists run the risk of exaggerating.

    When a new member of the Congress of the USA, states that man-made climate change will destroy the world within 12 years if we don’t act now, she will get two responses:  the first, immediate response will be more fear and anger, especially from children and young people.  That creates wider gaps between generations; more blame and tension between young and old will not be constructive!

    The second response will be a medium to long term credibility gap.  The Congresswoman in question and her message will be discredited as year follows year; the result of that will be exactly the opposite of what she is trying to accomplish.  Those who were stirred to anger will lose interest, go quiet and then will be unlikely to take the message seriously again.

    But for the moment, school children have been stirred up to strike and demand change.  Christopher Booker, one of my favorite newspaper columnists, writes the following in the Sunday Telegraph on March 24, 2019.

    “Whatever we may think in general about the BBC’s absurdly skewed coverage of all matters relating to energy and climate change, there has been something peculiarly distasteful about its relentless promotion of the “school strikes” and the “children’s crusade” against global warming.”

    From endless sound-bite interviews, it was clear that the children knew virtually nothing about either the science or politics of climate change. Their faces may be contorted with self-righteous anger, but their heads are merely stuffed with a few little “the end of the world is nigh” slogans, presumably fed to them by the same teachers who urged them to go on these marches where youngsters chanted obscenities against Theresa May, and the Communist hammer-and-sickle flag fluttered above the crowd.”

    If we think these are serious problems, and I think they are, we must first acknowledge that they are complex, hard to define with accuracy, and solutions are very hard to find.  But we can start with the importance of personal responsibility.  Each of us must do what we know we can do.  (Recycle, don’t use plastic bags, walk or ride a bike when possible, if you need a car make it one that is as economical as possible, work on reducing your personal consumption, repair items when you can, have your own vegetable patch if possible. There’s lots you can do.)

    Then we need to do our best to read, listen to and watch all sides of the arguments on each issue.  When we do that, we will find that reliable consensus does not yet exist on the issues getting the most publicity, illustrating that actual macro-causes and solutions are hard to find.  That’s one reason why personal responsibility is a good starting point.

    I was recently listening to Dr Jordan Peterson; I often listen to him because I find him both enlightening and entertaining.  His thinking is a great stimulus.  He recommended Bjorn Lomborg and referred to him as a “real genius”.  So, I found his TedTalk.

    His approach is level-headed and he has pulled together a very capable team.  Have a look at his conclusions.

    I will finish by coming back to personal responsibility: Blame is easy. If my problems are the result of the behavior of others, then “they” have to change to make my life better.  All I have to do is join some like-minded people in demonstrating, expressing my anger and maybe destroying some property, but then I can go home and carry on as I wish.  But nothing will really change until I take responsibility for the bit I can do.  Then maybe I can encourage others to do the same.

    I have a friend who often has quite large numbers for dinners at her house.  She had some younger people helping her clear up and someone commented that she was not recycling her plastic bottles, and there were a lot of them.  She explained that she was in favor of recycling and believed it was good, but just hadn’t got around to doing it.  She immediately realized she was being hypocritical.  If she believed it, she had to do it!  That was the moment when she changed her behavior.  Now she can encourage others to do the same!

    So, let’s take personal responsibility.  In the meantime, let’s not exaggerate the magnitude, or the urgency, of the problems.   We want people to be in this struggle for the long-haul.  God’s good creation and our mandate to steward it, requires our best efforts for our entire lives.

    Lynn Green.

  • Family: God’s Loving and Kind Design

    Family: God’s Loving and Kind Design

    Photo ©Guduru Ajay

     

    **This is a personal website and reflects my thoughts and convictions. It does not represent any official position held by Youth With A Mission.**

    I’m sitting at my computer with my wife of nearly 50 years just a few feet away, in front of a warm wood fire.  These circumstances stir up thoughts about the goodness of God and the infinite intelligence displayed in his design of family.

    SHAPING ONE ANOTHER

    We have been companions for the past 5 decades.  Some moments have been hard, fractious and frustrating, but the overwhelming themes have been love, mutual support, encouragement, affection, intimacy, warmth and complementary abilities.  We have loved one another and, at the same time, have discipled one another.

    We have seen four children into adulthood, into marriage and into parenthood.  We look back at many things we could have done better.  Things we know now that we wish we had known then.  We have been humbled by our failures as parents and basked in the joy of seeing our children do great things.

    AT LEAST THREE GENERATIONS

    We deeply enjoy the pleasure of 11 grandchildren, all of whom live within a short distance of us—a blessing we never anticipated.  But, even though all our children have travelled widely and are mostly still engaged in other nations, they have chosen to live near us—a pleasure find hard to believe!

    Our marriage relationship has been the primary human factor in shaping our Christian lives.  We have argued, been angry or hurt many times, but the Holy Spirit has used these times to bring us to conviction, repentance and positive change.  Our children and grandchildren have provoked us to a rich prayer life together—alternating between desperation at times, and gratitude.

    PURE LOVING-KINDNESS

    Surely it is the unfathomable love of God that resulted in the design of family.  He kindly, you might say lavishly, made us male and female.  He decided that our intimate love with one another would result, normally, in children.  He planned for the children to be nurtured in the love between a man and a woman and that their humble, determined, but joyful efforts to make their relationship work would prepare their children for satisfying living in a sinful and suffering world.

    REDEEMING EVERY SITUATION

    And then, He made provision for those whose lives have not begun or been shaped in the context He designed.  Where children have been born and/or raised outside of a grace-filled love between a man and a woman, He extends his loving-kindness to redeem those lives and “make all things new”.

    MORE THAN WONDERFUL

    This Providential design is too wonderful for us to treat it dismissively or to decide that we can do better.  Though He can redeem all things, we are wise to seek the best of His original design.

    I think I’ll join my wife by the fire now.

    Lynn.