Category: Worldview

  • Time Bombs – In Education

    Time Bombs – In Education

     

    **This is a personal website and reflects my thoughts and convictions. It does not represent any official position held by Youth With A Mission.**

    Do you ever read something that contains a new thought, and then that thought begins to trigger little time bombs in your mind? That is, it continues to set off other new thoughts over the following days and weeks. Obviously that happens to me or I would not be mentioning it!

    EDUCATION FOR THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION

    I read a statement which claimed that our current format for schools and education is the product of the industrial revolution. Leaders of formative industries needed to find a way to free adults from the responsibilities of caring for and educating their children so they could work in factories. So education, as we know it, developed as a by-product of the drive for economic growth and wealth creation.  Most of the workers producing this wealth were parents working long days while their children were in school.

    This cultural shift resulted in new and highly valued freedoms.  Boys were no longer destined to stay in the trade of their fathers and girls began a path to more opportunity than ever before.   I am grateful for all the wealth created; it has resulted in many benefits—better health, housing, food, literacy, democratic processes—the list could get very long.

    PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITY

    However, this must have some implications for how we think about education. I for one have long felt that the primary responsible for educating, training, developing children lies with parents and yet our current arrangement places that responsibility firmly in the hands of professional educators. They are the ones who have our children for the majority of their waking hours. Our cultural and financial expectations push us to turn our children over to others at a very young age.  We rarely know those “others” well enough to be confident about what they are teaching and whether or not they will model the values held by the parents.  They in turn have been shaped by professional educators and the content of what they teach is usually mandated by government policy and educational specialist in the sphere of government.  Is this a healthy thing?

    DESTRUCTIVE EDUCATION

    Most Christian parents on either side of the Atlantic over recent years will have been concerned about several aspects of the education of their children.  Recently, we have seen the shift towards sex education including redefining marriage, gender fluidity, normalising transgender medical procedures, etc.  These subjects are important.  However, equally or more important is the teaching of such foundational subjects as English literature, History and Science with a studied absence of any reference to God or any higher authority.  Our children usually absorb the idea that human intellect is the highest authority and that morals and values are relative and evolving.  Understandably, most Christian parents harbour some level of concern that the nature of their children’s education, if it is provided by State schools, does not build any sort of foundation of faith and is almost always actively destructive to Christian faith and behaviour.

    WHERE ARE THE NEW MODELS?

    At the same time, and paradoxically, the Christian community has a growing confidence in the intellectual integrity and consistency of their faith.  Yet we have little or no opportunities to impart that confidence to our children.  We are simply too busy to do that, and so out of practical necessity, we accept that professional educators will shape our children and to a great extent their beliefs.  I conclude that we have to “swim against the tide” and develop more ways to educate our children in the beauty of our faith.  We were created to “love the Lord our God with all our heart, mind, soul and strength”.  Without concerted, God-centred education, our children will not be likely to obey this, “the greatest of all commandments”.

    WHAT ARE WE MULTIPLYING?

    These thoughts have led me to think again about how we help less developed nations.  Christian missionaries and workers are often on the frontline of providing assistance, technology and finance to nations and peoples who are less developed. One of our assumptions is that they need schools like our schools.  Many Christians have committed themselves to developing education systems in poorer nations.  I have been to some of those schools and they can be wonderful.  The teachers are trained in the best of education principles but are also spurred on in their spiritual growth and their Christ-centred living.  But are we possibly imparting a system that is too vulnerable to follow the path of our developed nations?  Should we be looking at ways to engaged parents more in the process of developing their children?  Is the accepted format for education with at least five long days a week spent in school the best we can do?  Is the system itself somehow flawed?

    TAKING EDUCATION BACK FROM GOVERNMENT

    I am convinced that centralised, national governments are not the appropriate authority for overseeing education.  We will probably always want and need professional educators, but they should be directly accountable to parents.  We will have to work out more ways to develop good standards and oversight without abdicating our God-given, parental mandate. There are some workable models in developed nations so we are not starting from scratch.

    I don’t have any complete answers at this point, but I think change often begins with asking the best questions.  Maybe you have some questions to go along with mine.  Than after thinking about the questions we might start finding some steps towards a better approach to education, one that does not so thoroughly drive a wedge between parents and children.  We are suffering because of this separation which may not always be caused by education, but there is certainly an educational contribution to it.

    IT IS OUR RESPONSIBILITY

    If we continue to pray the prayer the Lord taught us, “Thy Kingdom come, Thy will be done…” then perhaps He has some new ways for us to think about how His kingdom comes in the education and development of our children.

    Lynn Green.

  • Marriage Has No Future

    Marriage Has No Future

     

    **This is a personal website and reflects my thoughts and convictions. It does not represent any official position held by Youth With A Mission.**

    Australia was one of the few countries that took the question of same sex marriage to the voters and they voted over 60% in favour of same sex marriage. So what? Well, it demonstrates that the process of redefining the word is complete in the thinking of most people in Western societies. (We need to remember, though, that the great majority of people in the world do not live in Western societies and they have rarely adopted this view.)

    Some individuals in the nations that have authorised same-sex marriage have realised that it has opened a door to interpret the word as they wish. Some are seeking recognition of their right to marry a pet. One man in Arizona applied to marry his horse and an English millionaire woman married a dolphin. I have no idea what thinking lies behind these acts, but they serve to demonstrate that the word “marriage” can now have many interpretations.

    Some commentators have predicted that the doors are now open for “marriages” between three or more people. If there are any tax or inheritance advantages to being “married” then we will see more and more “marriages” that simply serve financial purposes. Others might get “married” to someone, or more than one, or to animals or things for the sake of publicity.

    We have set out on a road without thinking enough about its destination. Eventually, governments will admit that when they abandoned the long-held traditional definition of marriage (as being between a man and a woman), they abandoned any clear meaning of the word. From that point, there will be no reference to it in law.

    Will it continue to have social or cultural meaning? In a word, NO. Already nearly half of all marriages break up and the trend is increasing. As the percentages increase, the meaning of the word fades into no meaning at all.

    But, I’m a man who has been happily, joyfully, contentedly married to the same woman for 47 years; we have four children and eleven grandchildren together. Marriage is not meaningless to me! When we got married in 1970, marriage had a firm Christian meaning. Those who married, did so “in the sight of God and man” with the intention of keeping their vows with God’s

    help. And He has helped, and is helping us! Do I have to abandon the word? At this point, I think I do.

    Nearly six years ago Dr Patrick Dixon spoke to an international group of missionary workers here at Highfield Oval, Harpenden, where I live. He could see that governments were intent on taking authority over marriage and family and that it was very likely that they would redefine the word. He told us that if they did, Christians would have to come up with a new term. He was right (and he usually is)!

    So, now is the time. That word, “marriage”, which used to be so highly valied has no future.

    I recently had a conversation around this subject with a wise friend who is a Member of Parliament here in London. I asked him if he thought we needed to start using a different term and he said, “Yes, we will need to refer to it as Holy Matrimony.” So, in other words, we don’t want to invent a term, but we should go back to an old term that has fallen out of use except in formal marriage ceremonies.

    Holy Matrimony. I like it.

    You might think that it will never catch on, but that is not the point. Our favoured word has been drained of meaning, so we cannot continue to use it without losing our distinctive identity as followers of Jesus Christ. There might even be a real advantage to adopting the old term. If those who really do intend to make and keep holy covenant before God and man use that term, then we might see a telling statistical difference between those who “get married” and those who “enter into Holy Matrimony”. If we sincerely mean what the traditional service says—that we make these vows before God, our Helper, and that we need the support of the community of followers of Jesus—then we will surely have a much lower failure rate than those who “get married” without clear faith and without the Family of Believers supporting them.

    Holy Matrimony. I could get used to it. Could you?

  • Kingdom of God and Spheres of Society

    Kingdom of God and Spheres of Society

     

    **This is a personal website and reflects my thoughts and convictions. It does not represent any official position held by Youth With A Mission.**

  • YWAM Europe Together

    YWAM Europe Together

     

    **This is a personal website and reflects my thoughts and convictions. It does not represent any official position held by Youth With A Mission.**